Showing posts with label In the news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label In the news. Show all posts

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Water, Grass and Beef

I haven't blogged in exactly 4 months.... June 11th- Sept 11th.  That is a long time. It isn't that I did not have things to say, its just that moving, broken arms, allergic reactions, making flower girl dresses and going to 3 weddings in 5 weeks (one in Belgium) took precedence. 

In the coming days I will post a few more wheat-soy-milk free recipes. Today, however, I want to talk about grass, water and beef.  I just read in my low-impact living e-newsletter that it takes 2,000 gallons of water to produce ONE POUND of conventional ground beef. I stress conventional because most of that water is used watering the corn grown to feed that cattle.  One more reason to buy grass fed beef. (Which is not that readily available commercially, I know.)  I know a wrote about this earlier, but I wanted to elaborate.

Why grass-fed beef?  I will note that my sources range from the documentary "Corn King" to Michael Pollan's The Omnivore's Dilemna to many internet sites. If you have time, read The Omnivore's Dilemna or watch Corn King (available at Blockbuster and Netflicks).

Back to grass-fed beef.  There are really three issues at hand: environmental, ethical and those that are health related.  First, you must understand how conventional beef is produced.  Cattle spend the last 60-120 days of their lives in feedlots where they are fed grain, predominately corn.  "60-160 days, that isn't too bad..." you think.  Consider two things: 1) that cattle usually go from birth to slaughter in less than 18 months, sometimes less than a year and 2) if fed grains longer than 160 days, they would die regardless.  Cattle are ruminating animals; they have a special digestive system with four stomachs, designed to process grass.  In The Omnivore's Dilemna, Michael Pollan describes what happens to grain-finished cattle:

"Perhaps the most serious thing that can go wrong with a ruminant on corn is feedlot bloat. The rumen is always producing copious amounts of gas, which is normally expelled by belching during rumination. But when the diet contains too much starch and too little roughage, rumination all but stops, and a layer of foamy slime that can trap gas forms in the rumen. The rumen inflates like a balloon, pressing against the animal's lungs. Unless action is promptly taken to relieve the pressure (usually by forcing a hose down the animal's esophagus), the cow suffocates.

A corn diet can also give a cow acidosis. Unlike that in own highly acidic stomachs, the normal pH of a rumen is neutral. Corn makes it unnaturally acidic, however, causing a kind of bovine heartburn, which in some cases can kill the animal but usually just makes it sick. Acidotic animals go off their feed, pant and salivate excessively, paw at their bellies and eat dirt.The condition can lead to diarrhea, ulcers, bloat, liver disease and a general weakening of the immune system that leaves the animal vulnerable to everything from pneumonia to feedlot polio."


Conventional/ Feedlot beef is always grain fed, and that grain is predominately corn.  Additionally, the major problem with feedlots, whether the beef variety or the "fish farm" is that by cramming so many of same animals together, it becomes a breeding ground for all sorts of bacteria, and so for the beeves (plural of beef) to be able to live to their "processing" date, they are administered routine antibiotics. I could go on at length here, but you can read my earlier post about fish farms and antibiotics.  Suffice it to say that currently antibiotics can be found in our drinking water  (along with antidepressants and other medications that we flush down the toilet) and there is as of yet no way to remove it from our drinking water.  We really don't need it added to the ground water.  Another problem with feedlots (where the grain-finishing happens) is that the waste produced by all of the animals becomes an issue.  While grass-fed cows produce manure, grain -fed cows produce something akin to toxic sludge that is completely unsuitable for any use.

Moving on, as nap time is only so long... They are so many people that I know who refuse to eat veal because of ethical concerns over their treatment, but happily buy and eat conventional beef.  I see feedlots and grain-feeding as unethical. Cows are meant to walk around, eat grass, not stand shoulder to shoulder, knee-deep in sludge. I understand that it is a cheap and efficient way to produce more meat and that demand is high.  However, consider this, it would be healthier for us to eat a little less meat and pay a little bit more for the grass- finished beef.

Finally, is there a difference in the quality?  Some would argue that the "quality", the marbeling of grain finished is better in grain-fed beef... but I would argue that taste is always acquired. Before the second world war, all beef was grass-finished and our grand-parents and great-grand-parents never complained. So, rather than discuss taste, which is subjective, I want to look at the health quality of the meat.  Grass-finished beef is higher in vitamins, omega-3's and lower in saturated fat.  It is considerably lower in fat, somewhere between 1/2 and 1/3  the amount of fat as grain-fed beef.  That is comparable to chicken!  What is more, Pollan argues that the current imbalance of Omega-3 fatty acids in the american diet has led to the increase of many chronic ailments that plague our society: diabetes, cancer, heart diseases, etc.  While not a great source of Omega 3's when you compare beef to salmon, it is still a source that we have moved away from in the past 50 years as food production has become more and more industrialized.

Additionally, Pollan would argue, there is a greater likelyhood to have E.Coli tainted grain-fed beef because the E.Coli have become adapted to a more acidic environment.  Remember that a cow's rumen is usually at a neutral pH, all of the little microbes that thrive in it can not survive the much more acidic human stomach. So, during the slaughter process, if some of the contents of the grass-fed beeves' rumens come in contact with some of  the meat, it should not pose a great danger to us. Our bodies can kill the bacteria.  Not so with bacteria that has been able to thrive in the higher pH rumens of grain-fed beeves.

What can we do?  As much as possible, buy local, pasture raised/ grass-finished beef (meat in general).  Go to localharvest.org,  select farms and type in your zip code. Hopefully there is a local farm not too far away from you that sells pasture raised meat. Invest in a freezer and buy part of a cow, pig, lamb and stock up. It will save you many trips to the grocery store, and you will be helping the environment and your family in the long run.  As for price, as corn has become in higher demand for ethanol, the cost of grain-fed beef has risen...  For those of you who think it is too "gamey", it really is all about the cooking.  At my brother's rehearsal dinner, my parents served venison. The bride's brother in law was sitting next to me and stated that he really did not like the gamey taste of venison... until he ate his first bite of that venison.  It was very well prepared by the caterer and he ate it all.  Perhaps in one of my next posts I will discuss that!  (And speaking of venison, it is a great local grass-fed form of meat... perhaps more in yet another post.)

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

A bit more about BPA in plastics....

Not to sound alarmist... but yesterday, Eric mentioned to one of our neighbors (who happens to have a PhD in chemistry) that we were concerned about plastics and asked if all the hype was true. He gave Eric a brief description of the history and to sum it all up... it is true and it is scary. He added that the plastics also emit these chemicals into the air and atmosphere. Studies have shown that seals living in the poles (north and south) have higher concentrations of it. I then decided to check it out on Wikipedia, if you'd like I've linked the article.

Here is the article...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisphenol_A


To summurize it briefly and (without plagiarizing!)
Studies in laboratory animals have linked variying levels of Bisphenol A (BPA) to the following conditions:

Permanent changes to genital tract
Changes in breast tissue that predispose cells to hormones and carcinogens
30% increase in prostate mass
Signs of early puberty
Decline in testicular testosterone
Breast cells predisposed to cancer
Prostate cells more sensitive to hormones and cancer
Insulin resistance
Decreased maternal behavior
Damage to eggs and chromosomes
Hyperactivity
Reversal of normal sex difference in brain structure

BPA is in many things, many of which are not food related, such as polyesters and PVC and is used as an antioxidant in food and cosmetics. BPA has been known to leach out of the plastic lining in some canned goods and from polycarbonate plastic containers after they have been used to contain high-temperature and highly acidic foods or cleaned with harsh detergents. First of all, I didn't realize that some cans are lined with plastic! One way to identify whether or not there is BPA in your plastic is to look at the recycle code at the bottom. Generally those labeled 2, 4 and 5 are considered safe. Those with 1,3,6 and 7 are not, 7 being the one that typically has the highest levels of BPA.

But here is another scary statistic: those people found with the highest concentrations... scarily enough are bottle fed infants as they consume most of their formula by way of plastic bottles that contain BPA. Liquid Formula cans are among the types of cans lined with plastics that leach BPA. Some infants consuming the liquid formulas can get up to 13 µg/kg/day, doses that in animals have been shown to have some of the effects listed above. If you use formula to feed your baby, try to avoid using the canned liquid kind and use glass bottles or ones that are BPA free.

Of all of this is in the wikipedia article. Again, only animal studies have been done, so this information isn't conclusive... but we decided that it really wasn't worth the chance to wait until scientists figure it all out. They have known since the 193os that BPA has had effects on the female reproductive system. They called it an "estrogen receptor antagonist". In any cases there also links to it in regards to cancer.

We have already gotten rid of most of our plastic food related items, as much as we can (the thermos sippy cups have plastic lids, though they are BPA free) and I think I'll be checking into wax paper as an alternate to Saran Wrap.

One more note: Some other dangerous chemicals commonly found in plastics, mostly vinyl and PVC, are called phthalates. (That "New" car smell... those are phthalates leaking into the air). Researchers have found that many baby care products contain certain phthalates that may lead to developmental and reproductive toxicity in infants. Such baby care products include soaps and lotions and shampoos. Additionally soft vinyl toys also contain phthalates (add that to the recent "Made in China" scare...) Again, a wikipedia article discusses this and you could google it and find out more for yourself. I think I will be a wiser consumer from now on, less plastic will come into our house and some things will just not make the next move.

A second thought: After re-reading this post, I thought it sounded a bit soap-boxish. I can't imagine life totally without plastic- I'd have no computer, vaccuum, refridgerator (and all other house-hold appliances for that matter). I still think though that we need to be aware of what we are putting into the environment and into our bodies. I am going to be a wiser consumer when it comes to food and body products and the containers they comes in. I am still in shock after having read that article. I didn't realize to what extent it already had been studied and how these chemicals are in so many things. I probably won't be posting too many posts like this one (not a very happy blog!!)... but I just had to talk about it since it was so surprising to me.